UrsulaV (ursulav) wrote,
UrsulaV
ursulav

Okay. Still not over the penis thing, and apparently it's got nothing to do with whether I'm getting laid or not.*

Actually, that doesn't surprise me. As weird as this sounds, and as much derisive laughter as I deserve for uttering it, there's something oddly non-sexual about these. They do not fill me with lust or anything like that. But because they're penises, they're kinda...iconic. For just a moment, I Have Your Complete Attention.** It's eyegrabbing, and it's funny, but I don't think it's really all that sexual, and a fair number of people commenting had a similar response.

Part of the reason I didn't want to use the frog, however, was because as soon as you add something in there that people can identify with, it GETS sexual. They're the frog, sitting on a penis, and dude, c'mon. That's just...err...yeah.

Nobody identifies with the butterfly. The butterfly is pretty, but it's not a PERSON.

My latest sketches are all penises with fish. Originally I had thought that the line was vertebrates, but I don't find myself identifying with the fish in the sketches, so maybe it's not about backbones. I just know that the fish are a kind of...decorative thing, like a butterfly...and the frog is a person. Is it about limbs? Lungs? Faces? (I suspect it's faces--the profile of a fish is an alien thing, one flat eye and a grimacing fixed mouth, the face of a frog has two eyes and a smile.)

Non-sexual sexual imagery. Hey, if it worked for Georgia O'Keefe...


*Just trust me on this one.

**I don't have anything useful to DO with it, but I do have your attention.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 87 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →